Vertigo (1956)
Dir: Alfred Hitchcock
I must admit that Alfred Hitchcock’s work is one of the big
deficiencies in my history as a cinephile. I have only watched five films by
the renowned director and though I’ve liked them all in one way or another,
I’ve never felt compelled to dig deeper into his filmography. Vertigo is the most personal and maybe even
best of the ones I’ve seen, but there are certain things about it that keep it
from being my favorite of his.
In Vertigo, the legendary James Stewart plays Scottie, a former
detective who leaves the force after his acrophobia (fear of highs) kicks in
during a rooftop chase and results in the dead of a fellow officer. Afterwards
he is recruited by his old friend, businessman Galvin Ester to use his skills
to follow his wife Madeleine (Kim Novak), whom he suspects is possessed and in
verge of committing suicide; Scottie accepts reluctantly.
Always a realist, Scottie believes her to be insane rather
than possessed. Shortly after they fall in love with each other and it is here
when things start getting really strange. Madeleine begins showing signs of her
possession by one of her ancestors. Scottie can’t do anything to stop her and
it all ends in tragedy.
It’s at this point where the themes of the movie change
radically. What used to be a mystery and somewhat supernatural story turns into
a tale of guilt, obsession and insanity. The big shift happens halfway through
the movie but it manages to keep things interesting and exciting so the viewer
never feels cheated.
Steward commands this film by portraying a genuinely
unlikable character. He’s obsessive, compulsive, neurotic and the kind of
person who tries to convince you that all the strange things happening around
you have some logical explanation to the point of annoying you. Steward
portrays these emotions not with expressions or movements, but with his big
blue eyes that tell you everything you need to know about his character better
than the dialogue would.
And in a way that is a great thing because the weakest part
of this movie is its dialogue, too melodramatic and self-explanatory for its
own good. Sometimes going as far as ruining scenes that could’ve been great.
But the key plot points remain interesting and make up for it, that is until
the absolutely horrendous and abrupt ending that kills any sense of excitement
that the story had going for it until it reaches that point. There’s a big
confession and then it just ends, like that, mid-climax. It’s an unsatisfying
and disappointing finale that leaves the viewer without any sense of conclusion.
That, combined with the long running-time and slow pacing keep
this movie’s story from flourishing the way it should. Characters like Scottie’s
friend played by Barbara Bel Gedes feel unnecessary; granted, it’s important to
show Scottie has normal relationships but her scenes are uninteresting and the
character is not developed further than being a jealous ex-girlfriend. It just
keeps the focus away from the really important characters.
If there’s something Hitchock is known for is his mastery of
every technical aspect of his movies. In Vertigo, the color plays an important
part in allowing us to understand the characters and it’s done in a beautiful
way. The uses of zooms and tracking
shots (usually at the same time and on opposite directions) do a fantastic job
in conveying the sense of vertigo Scottie is feeling and the color flashes and
animation combined with live-action really get us deep into his deteriorating
mind. If there’s one scene that summarizes the perfect technical qualities of
this film is when Kim Novak first appears on screen in the restaurant
scene, the combination between the angle
of the shot, her clothes, the background and the music is simply magnificent.
Vertigo is technically the best of the Hitchcock’s films I’ve
seen, but its many flaws really hindered my enjoyment of it. The main story is certainly exciting and it’s
interesting to see a more personal side to Hitchcock’s film in the character of
Scottie, who tries to model his girl in the way he wants her to be, not unlike what
Hitchcock did with his main actresses. But it just lacks that entertainment
value of his other films, which is why North by Northwest still remains my
favorite of his work.
0 comments:
Post a Comment